Top Issues Found on Medical Coding Audits
When conducting a coding audit in the healthcare industry, several common issues tend to crop up. Coding audits are crucial for maintaining accuracy and compliance in medical billing and coding. The results of a coding audit can significantly impact hospitals in several ways, ranging from financial implications to changes in operational processes. Here are some of the top coding issues frequently identified during these audits.
Upcoding and Downcoding:
Upcoding: This occurs when a healthcare provider uses a code that reflects a higher level of service than was actually provided or more an expensive procedure than what was actually performed. This can lead to higher reimbursement but is considered fraudulent.
Downcoding: This involves using a code that reflects a lower level of service, a less expensive code. This often happens accidentally but can lead to reduced reimbursement and potential underpayment for services rendered.
Incorrect Use of Modifiers:
Modifiers are essential for providing additional information about a procedure or service. Incorrectly applying them can result in claim denials or incorrect payment. Common issues include omitting necessary modifiers, using inappropriate modifiers, or misplacing modifiers. Examples are the overuse of modifier 22 and using modifier 25 incorrectly to bill for a separate evaluation and management (E/M) service on the same day as a procedure.
Incomplete or Missing Documentation:
Proper documentation is crucial to justify the codes used. Missing or incomplete documentation can lead to coding errors and claims being denied as it fails to justify the services billed. Every procedure and diagnosis must be clearly documented to support the coding.
Required provider signatures or dates may be absent, rendering documentation invalid.
Medical coding requires a high level of specificity. Using generic codes when more specific ones are available can result in improper billing. Specificity is particularly important in ICD-10 coding, which offers a detailed range of codes for various conditions. Critical information is needed to support the selected codes, such as specifying the site, severity, or type of a condition. Failing to use the most specific code available can lead to inaccurate data and potential underpayment. Specificity in coding is crucial for accurate patient records and reimbursement.
Mismatched Codes:
Ensuring that diagnosis codes (ICD-10) and procedure codes (CPT) match is vital. Mismatched codes can result in claim denials. For example, a procedure code for a surgical procedure should match the diagnosis code indicating the condition that necessitated the surgery. Pairing diagnosis codes with procedure codes that don’t logically match will result in claim denials.
Unbundling:
Unbundling involves reporting multiple codes for a procedure that should be covered by a single comprehensive code. This can happen either intentionally, to increase reimbursement by charging for multiple services, or unintentionally, due to a lack of understanding of the coding guidelines on code assignment.
Failure to Follow Guidelines:
Different insurance payers may have specific coding guidelines and requirements and can vary significantly. Failing to adhere to these requirements can lead to claim denials. It’s essential to be familiar with the guidelines of each payer.
The official coding guidelines provided by organizations like the American Medical Association (AMA) or the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and each coding system (ICD, CPT, HCPCS) has specific guidelines that need to be followed. Deviating from these can result in inaccurate coding and compliance issues.
The National Correct Coding Initiative involves automated prepayment edits that reference code pairs billed on the same day. Not checking for NCCI can lead to denials.
Inconsistent Coding Practices:
Different coders interpreting the same documentation differently leads to inconsistencies and inaccuracies in coding. Regular training and audits are essential to maintain consistency.
Absence of standardized coding policies and procedures across the organization, results in varied coding for similar cases.
Wrong Code Assignment:
Coding an incorrect diagnosis or procedure can result in claim denials and potential legal issues. It is crucial to ensure the diagnosis codes accurately reflect the patient’s condition and services performed. Documentation discrepancies or inconsistencies between the medical record documentation and the codes assigned, leads to inaccurate coding.
Using inappropriate infusion, hydration, and injection codes, especially when reported in tandem and/or across multiple days must have proper documentation, particularly start and stop times.
Errors in Medical Necessity:
Claims can be denied if the documentation does not sufficiently justify the medical necessity of a procedure or service.
Incorrect Sequencing:
Placing diagnosis codes in the wrong order, can affect an organization’s reimbursement and clinical reporting.
There are positive affects in correcting coding issues for hospitals. Improved documentation leads to more accurate coding and better clinical decision making and continuity of care. Increased patient satisfaction due to less disputes and complaints related to billing. More accuracy in quality reporting which affects a hospital’s public quality scores and benchmarks. Accurate coding contributes to reliable data for strategic planning, resource allocation, and performance improvement initiatives. And also, a positive impact toward payer contracts as accurate coding and billing are critical during negotiations.
The overall impact of a coding audit on a hospital encompasses financial health, operational efficiency, regulatory compliance, and reputation. Proactively addressing audit findings can lead to significant improvements in these areas, enhancing the hospital's ability to provide high-quality care and maintain financial stability.
Addressing these common coding issues can significantly improve the accuracy of medical coding and billing processes, leading to fewer claim denials and better financial outcomes for healthcare providers as well as ensuring compliance with regulatory standards, ultimately leading to more efficient and effective healthcare management. The best way to address these coding issues is to perform coding audits. Regular coding audits with proper training, and robust processes, can significantly improve compliance and revenue integrity in healthcare organizations.
Are you looking for a vendor to handle your coding audits? Look no further than STAR Medical Auditing Services! Our auditors are fully credentialed, 100% U.S. based, disbursed across the Country and ready to work for you! Our comprehensive Executive Summary Reports showcase audit findings, error trends, opportunities for education and more. You will shine when presenting to your organization’s leadership. Call today for a quote!
